KAMALA HARRIS, JUST ANOTHER LEFTWING MOONBAT OF A DEMOCRAT…

  • Have you ever wondered what is it that seems to so confound your average Democrat about why it is that there must be consequences for not obeying our laws?  For instance, suppose you, as someone who is a responsible and mature adult, took part in some illegal activity that you knew going in would result in you being separated from your child if you were to be apprehended.  Now, whose fault should it be, if you were to be apprehended during the committing of said illegal activity, that your child would then be removed from your custody and placed in ‘protective care?’   

    According to Democrats the fault lies not with the offender, but with those who took part in enforcing the laws.  You see, it was Democrat Kamala Harris, your average run-of-the-mill Democrat, who attempted to grill Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen over the policy of separating illegal aliens from their children when they are caught entering the country ‘illegally.’  Harris opposes the policy, in which illegal alien adults are detained and children are placed in the custody of the Department of Health and Human Services while the adult’s case is adjudicated.

    It was during a hearing of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Tuesday that Harris, in using part of her opening statement, said, “I’m extremely concerned about the administration’s repeated attacks on some of the most vulnerable communities, and in particular children and pregnant women as it relates to the world of DHS.”  It’s worth nothing that Harris is another of those rabid progressives who sees no real need for any amount of border security as she is also of the opinion that ANYONE who wishes to come into America should be able to do so.

    Ms. Nielsen denied that she had been asked to separate illegal alien parents from their children as a method of deterrence.  She said, “My decision has been that anyone who breaks the law will be prosecuted.”  And she went on to say, “If you’re a parent or you’re a single person or you happen to have a family, if you cross between the ports of entry, we will refer you for prosecution. You’ve broken U.S. law.”  It would seem that suffering any form of consequence for breaking the law would be a concept that is completely foreign to anyone in the Democrat Party.

    Harris, of course, expressed her concern regarding the policy of detaining parents, causing separation from their children.  But it was Ms. Nielsen who then proceeded to remind the Senator from California that U.S. citizen parents are separated every day in the United States when those parents are arrested or sentenced to prison.  When an illegal alien is arrested crossing the border with a child, Harris said she worries “they will be separated from their parent.”  Ms. Nielsen responded, “Just as we do in the United States every day.”  Which must have come as quite a surprise to Harris.

    Perhaps Harris should take a long look in the nearest mirror.  And if she did what she would see looking back at her is a racist, nasty, mediocre, dull, vacuous politician of the very worst sort.  She chooses to ignore that all of those illegal immigrants that she wants in this country are the very ones taking jobs from legal American CITIZENS, and that includes teenagers, minorities and low-skill level men and women, or the ones she claims she most wants to help.  Hopefully it’s Nov. 6, 2018 that will prove that Americans have grown tired of power-driven commies and socialists like Ms. Harris.

    I have officially put Harris in the same category as Hitlery. I'm so sick of seeing her face or listening to her selective outrage I just turn her off. Someone needs to ask her just exactly what she has accomplished for America while serving as a U.S. Senator. Then ask her point blank, for a yes or no answer, “does she support the rule of law and all laws as written?”  She is allowed to worm her way out of answering questions just like Hitlery, was and continues to be. Time for some tough media questions and tough follow-up, but it’s unlikely that any will be forthcoming any time soon.

    I’ve always found it to be more than just a little hypocritical how it is that Democrats are so easily able to view as perfectly acceptable their tendency to be rather selective when it comes to viewing which laws are in need of being enforced and which laws are not.  Because typically it’s those laws that seem to impact their core constituencies the most that they claim are either in no need of being enforced or that the punishment for breaking them is far too severe.  Democrats seem to think that the laws should simply not apply to those who chose to vote for them.

    I’d like Harris to please explain to me how it is that since the government produces absolutely nothing of any value, where does the money come from to clothe, house, feed, educate, and provide healthcare for these future Democrat voters?  Will it simply fall from the sky or will it simply grow on the money trees there on the Democrat plantation.  And where in the Constitution does it say that the American people must provide for the financial support of all those who come to the U.S. either legally or illegally? Is it in fine print or perhaps written in invisible ink?

    And can you, Ms. Harris, also explain to me again about how it is that the Democrat Party is the party of the poor, the middle class, and American working families while at the same time seeking to allow those to flood into the nation those who compete for jobs at ever decreasing wages and what little affordable housing remains.  How many of our own citizens have been displaced by those here illegally?  How about a bit of honesty on the part of your party by admitting that the Democrats long ago abandoned working class Americans in favor of those who come here illegally.

    Look, I think we can all agree that the only thing Ms. Harris is the least bit concerned about is her own political, self-serving agenda.  She’s another socialist who calls herself a Democrat.  She continues to suck up to the extreme left of her party so they will back her career.  Too bad she doesn't have a drop of charisma.  Anger, and having a perpetual chip on your shoulder, will only get one so far, just ask Hitlery.  And I feel confident in saying that Ms. Harris has gotten about as far as she’s going to get.  She is nothing more than another arrogant female suffering from delusions of grandeur. 

(200 symbols max)

(256 symbols max)